The power of Jotedars was more effective within the village than that of zamindars for the following reasons:

Local Presence: Jotedars were typically local landholders who resided in or near the villages they controlled. This local presence allowed them to have direct and continuous interactions with the villagers.

Direct Control: Jotedars exercised direct control over a significant section of poor villagers. They often owned or managed the land on which the villagers worked. 

Social and Cultural Ties: Jotedars had strong social and cultural ties with the villagers. They were often part of the same local communities and shared common customs and traditions. This familiarity and shared identity made it easier for Jotedars to influence and maintain order within the village.

Economic Dependence: Many villagers were economically dependent on Jotedars for land, employment, and resources. This economic interdependence gave Jotedars significant leverage over the villagers' livelihoods and well-being.

Local Governance: Jotedars often played a role in local governance and community affairs, which further enhanced their power and authority within the village.

So, the correct option is [2].